Antibody data
- Antibody Data
- Antigen structure
- References [1]
- Comments [0]
- Validations
- Immunocytochemistry [1]
- Flow cytometry [2]
- Chromatin Immunoprecipitation [1]
Submit
Validation data
Reference
Comment
Report error
- Product number
- MA5-32760 - Provider product page
- Provider
- Invitrogen Antibodies
- Product name
- WDR5 Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (JM73-53)
- Antibody type
- Monoclonal
- Antigen
- Synthetic peptide
- Description
- Recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies are produced using in vitro expression systems. The expression systems are developed by cloning in the specific antibody DNA sequences from immunoreactive rabbits. Then, individual clones are screened to select the best candidates for production. The advantages of using recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibodies include: better specificity and sensitivity, lot-to-lot consistency, animal origin-free formulations, and broader immunoreactivity to diverse targets due to larger rabbit immune repertoire.
- Reactivity
- Human, Mouse, Rat
- Host
- Rabbit
- Isotype
- IgG
- Antibody clone number
- JM73-53
- Vial size
- 100 µL
- Concentration
- 1 mg/mL
- Storage
- Store at 4°C short term. For long term storage, store at -20°C, avoiding freeze/thaw cycles.
Submitted references Pseudogene ACTBP2 increases blood-brain barrier permeability by promoting KHDRBS2 transcription through recruitment of KMT2D/WDR5 in Aβ(1-)(42) microenvironment.
Liu Q, Liu X, Zhao D, Ruan X, Su R, Shang X, Wang D, Yang C, Xue Y
Cell death discovery 2021 Jun 14;7(1):142
Cell death discovery 2021 Jun 14;7(1):142
No comments: Submit comment
Supportive validation
- Submitted by
- Invitrogen Antibodies (provider)
- Main image
- Experimental details
- Immunofluorescence analysis of WDR5 was performed using 70% confluent log phase MCF-7 cells. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton™ X-100 for 15 minutes, and blocked with 2% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature. The cells were labeled with WDR5 Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (JM73-53) (Product # MA5-32760) at 5µg/mL in 0.1% BSA, incubated at 4 degree Celsius overnight and then labeled with Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Superclonal™ Recombinant Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 (Product # A27034) at a dilution of 1:2000 for 45 minutes at room temperature (Panel a: green). Nuclei (Panel b: blue) were stained with SlowFade® Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Product # S36938). F-actin (Panel c: red) was stained with Rhodamine Phalloidin (Product # R415, 1:300). Panel d represents the merged image showing localization to nucleus. Panel f represents control cells with no primary antibody to assess background. The images were captured at 60X magnification.
Supportive validation
- Submitted by
- Invitrogen Antibodies (provider)
- Main image
- Experimental details
- Flow Cytometric analysis of WDR5 in Hela cells using a WDR5 Monoclonal Antibody (Product # MA5-32760) at a dilution of 1:100, as seen in red compared with an unlabelled control (cells without incubation with primary antibody; black).
- Submitted by
- Invitrogen Antibodies (provider)
- Main image
- Experimental details
- Flow Cytometric analysis of WDR5 in Hela cells using a WDR5 Monoclonal Antibody (Product # MA5-32760) at a dilution of 1:100, as seen in red compared with an unlabelled control (cells without incubation with primary antibody; black).
Supportive validation
- Submitted by
- Invitrogen Antibodies (provider)
- Main image
- Experimental details
- Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay of endogenous WDR5 protein using Anti-WDR5 Antibody: ChIP was performed using Anti-WDR5 Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (JM73-53) (Product # MA5-32760) 5 µg, on sheared chromatin from HCT116 cells using the MAGnify ChIP System kit (Product # 49-2024). Normal Rabbit IgG was used as a negative IP control. The purified DNA was analyzed by qPCR using primers binding to transcriptional start site and gene body (+2kb) of GAPDH, and SAT2 satellite repeats. Data is presented as fold enrichment of the antibody signal versus the negative control IgG using the comparative CT method.